1993 Plymouth Laser Reviews, Pricing & Specs
Write a reviewOur experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
User reviews for 1993 Plymouth Laser
Write a reviewUser rating:
by Ron L
Jul 30, 2009
The acceleration & handling were both none less then amazing. It was a very sturdy car, I had an after-market stereo system in it & there was very little buzz & rattle from the car. The cabin was very good @ keeping exterior noises out even with the sunroof open. Gas mileage was very decent for a turbo powered vehicle @ 25 mpg both city & freeway. It was a always a blast to drive no matter the reason & I never lost a race in it :)Jul 30, 2009
by Preston M
Jun 05, 2008
Turbo AWD is the way to goJun 05, 2008
by Ben K
Feb 13, 2008
1 rust spot. getting that taken care of soon. rims are new. getting it lowered hopefully soon. interior is super clean. have a magnaflow exhaust on it.Feb 13, 2008
User rating:
by Ron L
Jul 30, 2009
The acceleration & handling were both none less then amazing. It was a very sturdy car, I had an after-market stereo system in it & there was very little buzz & rattle from the car. The cabin was very good @ keeping exterior noises out even with the sunroof open. Gas mileage was very decent for a turbo powered vehicle @ 25 mpg both city & freeway. It was a always a blast to drive no matter the reason & I never lost a race in it :)Jul 30, 2009
by Preston M
Jun 05, 2008
Turbo AWD is the way to goJun 05, 2008
by Ben K
Feb 13, 2008
1 rust spot. getting that taken care of soon. rims are new. getting it lowered hopefully soon. interior is super clean. have a magnaflow exhaust on it.Feb 13, 2008
by Robert M
Feb 02, 2008
Fun car to drive. Quick, but could be a lot faster. More reliable than the turbo model but not as fun.Feb 02, 2008
1993 Plymouth Laser Pricing
Trims & specs
Sorry, something went wrong