2004 Mazda MAZDA3 Reviews, Pricing & Specs

















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































What owners say
"Overall, drivers are very positive about the 2004 Mazda MAZDA3, praising its performance, handling, and fuel efficiency. Many enjoyed its responsive acceleration and fun driving experience, especially with the manual transmission. Owners frequently noted the car's practicality and low maintenance costs. However, a few expressed concerns about interior space for taller passengers and noted some typical wear and tear as the car ages."
Performance- Acceleration is good for a 4-cyl, but the fact that it's FWD isn't the best. Braking is very good, and handling is fantastic. Even with a mediocre set of tires, the Mazda3 is practically glued to the road. Build Quality- There are some rattles, specifically "glovebox rattle", a common occurrence in Mazdas, I've heard. Easy to fix, but obnoxious nonetheless. Appearance- Interior is very tasteful. Build specifically for drivers. Good amount of interior space, too. The 2004-2009 front fascia is much more aggressive than the new, smiley 2010s. Cost- Great gas mpg, cheap maintenance. Overall, awesome. Fun Factor- This car is a blast. It will surprise you how great it handles on back-roads, and is very nimble.
September 7, 2009The best car we have ever owned. No faults. Great performance, fuel efficiency, boot space. Has 6 stacker, 8 air bags, nice looking trim. Never had any issues.
July 10, 2008Excellent Car!, has 160K (KM), trouble free. Still get the looks. Just changing oil, brakes, tires, air filter, oil filter (typical maintenance). Drives a lot like a German car, tight, precise steering, lots of low end grunt. Road noise can be a little excessive.
November 12, 2009What owners say
Performance- Acceleration is good for a 4-cyl, but the fact that it's FWD isn't the best. Braking is very good, and handling is fantastic. Even with a mediocre set of tires, the Mazda3 is practically glued to the road. Build Quality- There are some rattles, specifically "glovebox rattle", a common occurrence in Mazdas, I've heard. Easy to fix, but obnoxious nonetheless. Appearance- Interior is very tasteful. Build specifically for drivers. Good amount of interior space, too. The 2004-2009 front fascia is much more aggressive than the new, smiley 2010s. Cost- Great gas mpg, cheap maintenance. Overall, awesome. Fun Factor- This car is a blast. It will surprise you how great it handles on back-roads, and is very nimble.
September 7, 2009The best car we have ever owned. No faults. Great performance, fuel efficiency, boot space. Has 6 stacker, 8 air bags, nice looking trim. Never had any issues.
July 10, 2008Excellent Car!, has 160K (KM), trouble free. Still get the looks. Just changing oil, brakes, tires, air filter, oil filter (typical maintenance). Drives a lot like a German car, tight, precise steering, lots of low end grunt. Road noise can be a little excessive.
November 12, 2009Extremely fun to drive, feels fast, even though the stock 2.3L 4-cyl engine puts out 150 bhp and the 0-60mph is roughly 8 sec. The manual version of this car is the only way to go. This car is just a blast to drive, you can feel the road and the tight handling is just great.
November 6, 2009The car handles very good, it is pretty peppy, I love the looks, very sporty with the functionality of a hatchback, however I would rather have a Speed3 which is capable of 155 mph and 0-60 in approx 5.5 seconds.
March 22, 2008It's a pretty good car. I like small performance sedans and this one fits the bill. I wish it were 200lbs lighter, had more camber adjustablility and had more supportive seats. I would consider buying another one, but only if the next genneration is lighter and has 7 inch wide wheels instead of 6.5 inches wide...
October 31, 2008Back in 2004 I went looking for a 2 year old Honda, Toyota or new Hyundai, but after one test drive on of the Mazda 3, it was game over, and the cost was only a couple thousand more than those 2 year-old used competitors' cars. This car has been great, it's a joy to drive, gets good mileage, and I plan on keeping it until the wheels fall off.
August 12, 2008Good car. Handled well. Perfect for our winters. Cheap on gas. Confortable and looked good.
July 7, 2008This car is quick, tight around corners, practical and most of all cheap. It is a fantastic hatchback, with a little zoom zoom.
January 10, 2008Still enjoying driving the car after 3 years. The suspension is getting a little loose though in its age, so there may be some need to stiff that up some in the near future. Otherwise the car has been very reliable.
December 17, 2007Trims & specs
Base MSRP $17,440 | Seating 5 |
Engine 2.3L 160 hp I4 | Cargo Capacity 0.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG 25 | Drivetrain FWD |
Base MSRP $17,665 | Seating 5 |
Engine 2.3L 160 hp I4 | Cargo Capacity 17.1 cu ft |
Combined MPG 25 | Drivetrain FWD |
Base MSRP $14,270 | Seating 5 |
Engine 2.0L 150 hp I4 | Cargo Capacity 0.0 cu ft |
Combined MPG 28 | Drivetrain FWD |
Base MSRP N/A | Seating N/A |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity N/A |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP N/A | Seating N/A |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity N/A |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |
Base MSRP N/A | Seating N/A |
Engine N/A | Cargo Capacity N/A |
Combined MPG N/A | Drivetrain N/A |







