1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Reviews, Pricing & Specs
Write a reviewOur experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
User reviews for 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
Write a reviewUser rating:
by Larry H
Sep 01, 2011
This vehicle does ok on MPG but lacks the horse power. Other than it needs more horse power it's a very good and reliable vehicle. The ride is nice and smooth. At high speed it might need to be a little tighter. It like to start floating at about 110 MPA.Sep 01, 2011
by Anonymous
Jan 30, 2011
very nice vehicle thatll last for ever. just right for the right person. thought i could find a better car ,but when i found this car with low mileage. i said its a winner. hope whoever gets a monte keeps itJan 30, 2011
by Anonymous
Dec 08, 2010
this is a nice car its fast and good on gas. its also good in the winter with winter tires. ive changed the gastank, starter, altinator, i also put in a new battery. overall this isnt a bad car for the 800 dollars i paid for it and it has lower millage.Dec 08, 2010
User rating:
by Larry H
Sep 01, 2011
This vehicle does ok on MPG but lacks the horse power. Other than it needs more horse power it's a very good and reliable vehicle. The ride is nice and smooth. At high speed it might need to be a little tighter. It like to start floating at about 110 MPA.Sep 01, 2011
by Anonymous
Jan 30, 2011
very nice vehicle thatll last for ever. just right for the right person. thought i could find a better car ,but when i found this car with low mileage. i said its a winner. hope whoever gets a monte keeps itJan 30, 2011
by Anonymous
Dec 08, 2010
this is a nice car its fast and good on gas. its also good in the winter with winter tires. ive changed the gastank, starter, altinator, i also put in a new battery. overall this isnt a bad car for the 800 dollars i paid for it and it has lower millage.Dec 08, 2010
by Josh F
Sep 14, 2010
First new car I owned after graduating from college. Was a MC fan since I owned a '79 MC and my dad owned/owns several others ('72, '96, '00, '06). Bad part about the car - the gaskets leaked and went out about 65K miles. Sep 14, 2010
by Renee H
Feb 05, 2010
its a very cut car. with snow tires it is not to bad in the snow. also sounds great when you test it ;). Ive had to put a little work into it because it has alot of miles on it. Feb 05, 2010
by Thomas L
Nov 04, 2009
Another fantastic automobile that i have had the luxury to own and another high mileage vehicle added to my collection. this one actually happens to be a Luxury Sport. acceleration was alright and turning was satisfactory, but bolt in some strut tower braces and weld on a new dual exhaust and hold on. it will handle with the agility of a bobcat and will sound like a roaring lion.Nov 04, 2009
by Ally M
Sep 20, 2009
it's my baby, my first car. Granted it's an older car but it runs very well for its age. It's needed very few repairs and they were cheap. No unwanted noise. I like the overall look of the car, esp. the tint (: gas mileage is what is expected, and it's a nice car to drive overall because you really don't see many of these anymore... especially this well-taken-care-of.Sep 20, 2009
by Jacob C
Jul 08, 2009
Great Car. I havent had a problem with it since ive had it.
Great on gas, cheap parts, is able to go when floored in
cases. Since it is a older car it needs struts for a comfort ride.
Hope this car lasts for many years. Jul 08, 2009
by Ricky T
Jun 15, 2009
this car is a very reliable car, black 3.4DOHC bout 220hp, 230lbs torque. rocker panels rot before the engine goes, very reliable transportation. very easy to customize interior. this is not a persons first car, needs to be taken care of in order to save her. :)Jun 15, 2009
by Gloria Z
Jan 27, 2009
Customized with a Brickyard 400 package. I was the original owner and drove it for over 8 years before it started to nickel and dime me to death. Unfortunately I had to get rid of it. This was one of the best cars I ever owned or drove.Jan 27, 2009
by Josh B
Dec 02, 2008
Amazing car, never had a better one.. its fast, sleek, and stylish.. power up the ying-yang.. few upgrades just put in it. no backseat less weight.. acceleration could be a bit faster but the body style makes up for it. it handles like a dream from 0-60. cant beat itDec 02, 2008
by Shawn Q
Nov 27, 2008
love it, fast, clean, nice looking, handles like a dream with performance tires, gas is good unless you stand on it, fits a carseat for families like mine, the ride is a little rough but then again it is a sports model, and performance tires dont make it any smootherNov 27, 2008
by Brandon S
Jun 10, 2008
good car, reliable , just not fast enoughJun 10, 2008
by Brycie N
May 20, 2008
average performance, has a rev limiter of 4000, and the interior is quite large. very big car as well, and the 3.4l is a touch noisy for the usage of it. (even though i know it is a Z34) quite slow of the start, but grabs after 2000 rpm, and picks up quicker... not the best rendition of the famed montecarlo, but its a car...May 20, 2008
by Jessica J
Apr 27, 2008
its a good car, got through the winter..havent broken down yet wish is nice. I like it alot.Apr 27, 2008
by JC P
Feb 23, 2008
The Car drives good up to about 85k, then the check engine light comes on that it's misfiring, and almost every sensor goes bad.Feb 23, 2008
by Anonymous
Nov 04, 2007
2 trannies and a hard to diagnose miss....its a painNov 04, 2007
by Anonymous
Jul 27, 2007
The 1996 Chevy Monte Carlo Z-34 is a racy, NASCAR-inspired two-door sport coupe. The vehicle has ample power from the 3.4L engine, and the available exterior and interior accessory options make for a very personalized vehicle.
The LS coupe came with a 3.1L V-6 engine, which is known for blowing head gaskets (same engine as the Chevy Cavalier). The Z-34 is an excellent powerhouse which is hard to work on, based on how it is sandwiched into the engine compartment, but which on the whole will not spend too much time being worked on anyway, as it is a driver, not a trailer queen.
The interior on these is large enough that a tall guy can drive the car comfortably (a problem for me with newer cars). This is what drew me to the vehicle.Jul 27, 2007
What users have asked
No questions found.Have a question?
1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Pricing
Original MSRP
$17,795 to $19,995Price range
N/AAverage price on CG
N/AYoY price change
N/ATrims & specs
Airbags
Dual front airbags
Audio System
Antenna Type: power · Single disc in-Dash CD · AM/FM radio
Brakes
ABS: 4-wheel
Comfort Features
Steering wheel trim: leather
Convenience Features
Multi-function remote: keyless entry · Steering wheel: tilt-adjustable · Steering wheel mounted controls: audio
Mirrors
Exterior mirrors: power
Roof
Moonroof: power
Seats
Front seat type: split-bench · Upholstery: leather
Tires and Rims
Wheels: alloy
Windows
Front wipers: intermittent
Airbags
Dual front airbags
Audio System
Antenna Type: power · Single disc in-Dash CD · AM/FM radio
Brakes
ABS: 4-wheel
Comfort Features
Steering wheel trim: leather
Convenience Features
Multi-function remote: trunk release · Steering wheel: tilt-adjustable · Steering wheel mounted controls: audio
Mirrors
Exterior mirrors: power
Seats
Front seat type: bucket · Upholstery: cloth
Tires and Rims
Wheel type: aluminum alloy
Windows
Front wipers: intermittent
