1995 Volkswagen Polo Reviews, Pricing & Specs
Write a reviewOur experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
Our experts haven't test driven this car yet.
User reviews for 1995 Volkswagen Polo
Write a reviewUser rating:
by Andy N
Sep 04, 2010
This was a 3 year old car when I brought it on 27,000 miles, it wasnt quick but it was for a little 1.3L it was quite involving as it had no power steering u felt the road which gave it a fun sporty feel, it was so reliable build quality was by far the best in its class mad Vauxhall nova's or Ford Fiesta's look very bad quality. I owned this in the days where my car mechanics know how was poor and it was overheating for over 2 months loosing water all the time, so I had to skim the head and do a heat gasket but apart from front shocks and servicing nothing went wrong with it all the way up to 115,000 miles, this was in the day when I travelled 100 miles a day for work hence the miles i did.Sep 04, 2010
by Karim S
Dec 23, 2009
This car was just brilliant. It drove and handled very well. It was very stable and solid. It wasn't very fast but it looked very sporty. The interior wasn't stylish. But it was definitely very fun to drive. It was easy to fix and maintain and it doesn't consume much of fuel.Dec 23, 2009
by Karol S
May 11, 2009
A very reliable car. Didn't need much attention, except for the usual (oil, water). Rarely broke down and if so, the rapairs weren't complicated nor costly.
A 1.3 engine (petrol) with its 55-or-so horse power wasn't very dynamic, but the car won its share of 'red light races'. Partly because the standard suspension provided a solid grip. The brakes could've been just a little more efficient, though (not that I had any accidents ;]).
I liked its line. As for a car from 1995 it maintained its good looks. However, rust had become quite a nuiscance with time. Its interior wasn't of the best quality, but it was alright and didn't poke the eyes.
I would recommend this as the first car for people who just got their driver's license.May 11, 2009
User rating:
by Andy N
Sep 04, 2010
This was a 3 year old car when I brought it on 27,000 miles, it wasnt quick but it was for a little 1.3L it was quite involving as it had no power steering u felt the road which gave it a fun sporty feel, it was so reliable build quality was by far the best in its class mad Vauxhall nova's or Ford Fiesta's look very bad quality. I owned this in the days where my car mechanics know how was poor and it was overheating for over 2 months loosing water all the time, so I had to skim the head and do a heat gasket but apart from front shocks and servicing nothing went wrong with it all the way up to 115,000 miles, this was in the day when I travelled 100 miles a day for work hence the miles i did.Sep 04, 2010
by Karim S
Dec 23, 2009
This car was just brilliant. It drove and handled very well. It was very stable and solid. It wasn't very fast but it looked very sporty. The interior wasn't stylish. But it was definitely very fun to drive. It was easy to fix and maintain and it doesn't consume much of fuel.Dec 23, 2009
by Karol S
May 11, 2009
A very reliable car. Didn't need much attention, except for the usual (oil, water). Rarely broke down and if so, the rapairs weren't complicated nor costly.
A 1.3 engine (petrol) with its 55-or-so horse power wasn't very dynamic, but the car won its share of 'red light races'. Partly because the standard suspension provided a solid grip. The brakes could've been just a little more efficient, though (not that I had any accidents ;]).
I liked its line. As for a car from 1995 it maintained its good looks. However, rust had become quite a nuiscance with time. Its interior wasn't of the best quality, but it was alright and didn't poke the eyes.
I would recommend this as the first car for people who just got their driver's license.May 11, 2009
by Ronny L
Feb 25, 2009
det er en polo
den køre langt på liter
det er en vw hvad mere kan man forlange
har kun haft vw og vil helst ikke have andet eller måske en stor audi eller en lada 1200 claccisk
jamen hvad skal jeg sige en gang vw altid vwFeb 25, 2009
by Kevin P
Jun 22, 2008
its awsomeJun 22, 2008
by Jean R
Apr 14, 2008
I owned a 1600 i
Went very well after a few tecnical problems with the Airbagelectronics.
Changed the Airbagelectronics 2 times .
Apr 14, 2008
by Rob B
Apr 02, 2008
I owned the 1.4 8V CL so has electric windows and mirrors, ABS, Drivers airbag,
power steering. As I said, not the fastest car, but acceleration up to 60 was enough. Good run
about car, not so good for motorway cruising! Very comfortable inside, ample space for
packing in people or loading up stuff!Apr 02, 2008
by Amir F
Apr 01, 2008
Tricked out 1.6L.Apr 01, 2008
by Anonymous
Feb 12, 2008
Ive had this car for a year and it has been amazing. Ive had a few problems with it but they were just common faults for its age. If you want to buy one , get one below 50K miles and you should have no problems.Feb 12, 2008
by Mathieu S
Jan 04, 2008
Needed this thing in France, so bought it as a second car.
Good quality, solid efficiency, can carry 5 ppl + luggage, but not on Autobahn!!Jan 04, 2008
by Dale A
Jan 01, 2008
1.6 glx polo 1995Jan 01, 2008
What users have asked
No questions found.Have a question?
1995 Volkswagen Polo Pricing
Trims & specs
No trims were found for this car.