Nissan sources the Z’s twin-turbo 3.0-litre V6 engine from the Infiniti Q50 and Infiniti Q60 Red Sport 400 models and tunes it for improved throttle response. When you’re accelerating hard, the car's rear end feels greasy thanks to the twin-turbo V6 engine’s 400 horsepower at 6,400 rpm and 350 pound-feet of torque between 1,600 rpm and 5,200 rpm, all sent to the rear wheels.
A six-speed manual transmission is standard. Carried over from the 370Z but reworked for use in the new Z, it offers smoother, more positive throws and pairs with an upgraded clutch that is reasonably easy to modulate. With Performance trim, it features SynchroRev Match, a delightful add-on that makes you feel like a pro driver while improving the car’s aural soundtrack.
You can get a nine-speed automatic transmission for $1,500 extra. It has a Sport mode and paddle shifters and is relatively fun to shift manually. Passe told us that in addition to offering the best fuel economy, the automatic also puts up the best performance numbers.
With Performance trim, both transmissions work with launch control to harness the engine’s power for the quickest acceleration. Performance trim also installs a mechanical limited-slip differential which, in our opinion, you’re going to want. It doesn’t take much to start breaking this car’s rear end loose, which can be thrilling, terrifying, or both at the same time.
Performance trim also adds a throatier exhaust note, larger brakes with red calipers, a sport suspension, Rays 19-inch forged aluminum wheels, and sticky Bridgestone Potenza S007 high-performance tires sized 255/40 in front and 275/35 in back.
So, how did all of these components come together in Nissan’s new sports car? We can’t truthfully say. The drive route east of Las Vegas near a startlingly empty Lake Las Vegas could’ve been driven fast in a Nissan Kicks, let alone a Nissan Z. Furthermore, the maximum posted speed limit on those flat, wide, gently curving roads was a meager 50 mph, or 80 km/h.
Here is what we did learn:
First, the Z is fast in a straight line, and you’ll need to carefully modulate the throttle to keep the rear tires glued to the road. Additionally, a short stint in a Z with the SynchroRev rev-matching manual gearbox demonstrated significant improvement over the old 370Z and convinced us this is the way to go for true driving enthusiasts, even if it’s not the fastest model. It adds joy to driving the car that is absent with the automatic, despite the auto’s fast downshifts. And the Performance trim’s forged aluminum wheels contribute to good ride quality in the city and on the highway, thanks to reduced unsprung weight at each corner of the car.
Road noise, we’re sorry to report, is excessive and likely contributed to some of our dissatisfaction with the Z’s voice recognition technology and Bose premium sound system.
In the city or traffic on the highway, the Performance trim’s stouter braking components provide a near-instantaneous response, so there is an acclimation period. Under hard braking, followed by fast turn-in, the Z’s brakes proved responsive and balanced. Still, nothing about the drive route tested the fortitude of those brakes under duress or fostered the highly focused, intense driver concentration that could determine whether the Z achieves that holy grail of man and machine as one.
The new rack-mounted electric steering is also more agreeable than the heavy hydraulic steering of the old 370Z. No, it’s not the drive-by-wire tech you’ll find in the Infiniti Q50 and Q60. And, finally, the exhaust note doesn’t have the same distinctive character as the old 370Z, but the new Z has a refined and engaging sound of its own.
For now, we’re going to give the Nissan Z the benefit of the doubt and err on the side of a favourable rating. But until we can get the car onto a challenging road with narrow lanes, undulating pavement, decreasing radius corners, and off-camber curves, we cannot put our stamp of approval on anything but the powertrain, which is delightful. However, even that comment is qualified until we examine how the car behaves under hard acceleration out of a corner.
Not only that, but during our (relaxed) driving experience, the Z returned better fuel consumption than expected. Natural Resources Canada provides fuel efficiency ratings of 10.6 litres per 100 kilometres in combined driving for the manual transmission and 11.9 for the 9-speed automatic. We got 10.5 L/100 km with the manual and 8.6 with the automatic.
However, you should take our results with a grain of salt because of the type of driving we experienced. Had we been able to drive the car in the manner for which it is designed, engineered, and tuned, it undoubtedly would have consumed more fuel.